So what do Mt. Everest and retirement have in common? Quite a bit actually! If I were to ask you, "What is your goal when you climb a mountain?" your answer would most likely be, "To get to the top." But do you also want to get back down? Oh, yeah...getting down. That's the part that most people don't think about when they climb a mountain, yet it's the spot where 75% of the deaths occur.
The same is also true for retirement. Most people focus entirely on the accumulation phase, while ignoring the distribution phase. This is equally hazardous to most financial plans. The problem is that traditional financial planning doesn't take into account how to best distribute assets in retirement until it's too late! Advisors constantly tout rate of return, while ignoring rate of withdrawal.
Let me give you an example*. This assumes both individuals save the same amount of money and retire at the same age.
Person A goes the route of traditional financial planning. He gets great rate of returns, while losing in various years when the market is down. At the end of the day he averaged 8% (which by the way is what Warren Buffet averages on his stuff). He's happy and has accumulated $1,000,000! Life is good! Traditional financial planning says that you can withdraw 3% of your account value adjusted for inflation each year and hopefully not run out of money according to Monte Carlo curves. So after all of Person A's hard work, he gets a first year check of $30,000. Wow, that's sort of depressing, but he did well and probably is better off than others.
Person B goes the nontraditional route of financial planning. He gets moderate returns, but never loses money with a downturn in the market. At the end of the day he averaged 6%. He was only able to accumulate $700,000. He's quite happy because his money was safe from market losses the whole time and still acquired a bit of assets. His rate of withdrawal, however, is 5.5%. This amount is also guaranteed to last his entire life. He will never outlive his money. He will get $38,500 each year guaranteed.
So the question becomes, who is better off in the end? To conservative investors, Person B is better off. To risky investors, Person A is better off. Person A's income should increase by about 3-4 percent each year with inflation, at least that's what history says. He would start making about the same amount of money after 8 years, but wouldn't catch up in overall dollars withdrawn until year 17.
From my experience in the financial world, most people are more conservative. Many think they are risky investors, but they cringe when their accounts drop. So most people are likely to enjoy Person B's experience more than Person A. There's a lot to be said for a stress free financial life! If you would like more information on the Person B scenario, contact me here.
*Rates of return and income withdrawn in the above examples are for illustration purposes only and in no way constitute actual performance. Guarantees are determined by each company and dependent on product. Please request actual illustrations for current rates and product information.
Showing posts with label income. Show all posts
Showing posts with label income. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Mt. Everest and Retirement
Friday, February 22, 2013
Top 10: Best and Worst Paying Jobs
If you are teetering on the edge about which major to choose in college, maybe this will help you make up your mind. That is if money is a key motivator for you! The Bureau of Labor Statistics did a study for the best and worst paying jobs back in May 2011. Here's what they found, at least the top ten!
Best Paying Jobs
Best Paying Jobs
1.
|
Anesthesiologists
|
At least 75% make above $187,200
|
2.
|
Surgeons
|
At least 75% make above $187,200
|
3.
|
Obstetricians
& Gynecologists
|
At least 50% make above $187,200
|
4.
|
Oral
& Maxillofacial Surgeons
|
At least 50% make above $187,200
|
5.
|
Orthodontists
|
At least 50% make above $187,200
|
6.
|
Physicians
& Surgeons, All Other
|
At least 50% make above $187,200
|
7.
|
Internists,
General
|
$183,170
|
8.
|
Psychiatrists
|
$170,350
|
9.
|
Family
& General Practitioners
|
$167,000
|
10.
|
Chief
Executives
|
$166,910
|
Worst Paying Jobs
1.
|
Combined
Food Preparation & Serving Workers, Including Fast Food
|
$18,230
|
|
2.
|
Cooks,
Fast Food
|
$18,300
|
|
3.
|
Dishwashers
|
$18,360
|
|
4.
|
Dining
Room & Cafeteria Attendants & Bartender Helpers
|
$18,420
|
|
5.
|
Shampooers
|
$18,420
|
|
6.
|
Gaming
Dealers
|
$18,460
|
|
7.
|
Counter
Attendants, Cafeteria, Food Concession, & Coffee Shop
|
$18,510
|
|
8.
|
Hosts
& Hostesses, Restaurant, Lounge, & Coffee Shop
|
$18,560
|
|
9.
|
Waiters
& Waitresses
|
$18,570
|
|
10.
|
Ushers,
Lobby Attendants, & Ticket Takers
|
$18,610
|
There you have it! The top 10 best and worst jobs as of May 2011! I guess I should have gone into some sort of medicine. Oh well! I hope this is helpful. If you want to look at the rest of the jobs posted on their website, you can go to http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/high_paying_occs.htm.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)